WHITES ARE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY DESIGN.

WHITES ARE SYSTEMATICALLY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST SIMPLY ON THE BASIS OF OUR RACE. HOW LONG WILL WE ALLOW THIS TO CONTINUE ? VOTE- VOTE- VOTE- CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN!

 

13 C.F.R. § 124.103   Who is socially disadvantaged?
Title 13 - Business Credit and Assistance

Title 13: Business Credit and Assistance
PART 124—8(a) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS STATUS DETERMINATIONS
Subpart A—8(a) Business Development
Eligibility Requirements for Participation in the 8(a) Business Development Program
Browse Previous |  Browse Next

§ 124.103   Who is socially disadvantaged?

(a) General. Socially disadvantaged individuals are those who have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias within American society because of their identities as members of groups and without regard to their individual qualities. The social disadvantage must stem from circumstances beyond their control.
(b) Members of designated groups. (1) There is a rebuttable presumption that the following individuals are socially disadvantaged: Black Americans; Hispanic Americans; Native Americans (American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians); Asian Pacific Americans (persons with origins from Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Japan, China (including Hong Kong), Taiwan, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Vietnam, Korea, The Philippines, U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Samoa, Macao, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Tuvalu, or Nauru); Subcontinent Asian Americans (persons with origins from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands or Nepal); and members of other groups designated from time to time by SBA according to procedures set forth at paragraph (d) of this section. Being born in a country does not, by itself, suffice to make the birth country an individual's country of origin for purposes of being included within a designated group.
(2) An individual must demonstrate that he or she has held himself or herself out, and is currently identified by others, as a member of a designated group if SBA requires it.
(3) The presumption of social disadvantage may be overcome with credible evidence to the contrary. Individuals possessing or knowing of such evidence should submit the information in writing to the Associate Administrator for 8(a) BD (AA/8(a)BD) for consideration.
(c) Individuals not members of designated groups. (1) An individual who is not a member of one of the groups presumed to be socially disadvantaged in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must establish individual social disadvantage by a preponderance of the evidence.
(2) Evidence of individual social disadvantage must include the following elements:
(i) At least one objective distinguishing feature that has contributed to social disadvantage, such as race, ethnic origin, gender, physical handicap, long-term residence in an environment isolated from the mainstream of American society, or other similar causes not common to individuals who are not socially disadvantaged;
(ii) Personal experiences of substantial and chronic social disadvantage in American society, not in other countries; and
(iii) Negative impact on entry into or advancement in the business world because of the disadvantage. SBA will consider any relevant evidence in assessing this element. In every case, however, SBA will consider education, employment and business history, where applicable, to see if the totality of circumstances shows disadvantage in entering into or advancing in the business world.
(A) Education. SBA considers such factors as denial of equal access to institutions of higher education, exclusion from social and professional association with students or teachers, denial of educational honors rightfully earned, and social patterns or pressures which discouraged the individual from pursuing a professional or business education.
(B) Employment. SBA considers such factors as unequal treatment in hiring, promotions and other aspects of professional advancement, pay and fringe benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment; retaliatory or discriminatory behavior by an employer; and social patterns or pressures which have channeled the individual into nonprofessional or non-business fields.
(C) Business history. SBA considers such factors as unequal access to credit or capital, acquisition of credit or capital under commercially unfavorable circumstances, unequal treatment in opportunities for government contracts or other work, unequal treatment by potential customers and business associates, and exclusion from business or professional organizations.
(d) Socially disadvantaged group inclusion—(1) General. Representatives of an identifiable group whose members believe that the group has suffered chronic racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias may petition SBA to be included as a presumptively socially disadvantaged group under paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Upon presentation of substantial evidence that members of the group have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identity as group members and without regard to their individual qualities, SBA will publish a notice in the Federal Register that it has received and is considering such a request, and that it will consider public comments.
(2) Standards to be applied. In determining whether a group has made an adequate showing that it has suffered chronic racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias for the purposes of this section, SBA must determine that:
(i) The group has suffered prejudice, bias, or discriminatory practices;
(ii) Those conditions have resulted in economic deprivation for the group of the type which Congress has found exists for the groups named in the Small Business Act; and
(iii) Those conditions have produced impediments in the business world for members of the group over which they have no control and which are not common to small business owners generally.
(3) Procedure. The notice published under paragraph (d)(1) of this section will authorize a specified period for the receipt of public comments supporting or opposing the petition for socially disadvantaged group status. If appropriate, SBA may hold hearings. SBA may also conduct its own research relative to the group's petition.
(4) Decision. In making a final decision that a group should be considered presumptively disadvantaged, SBA must find that a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that the group has met the standards set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this section based on SBA's consideration of the group petition, the comments from the public, and any independent research it performs. SBA will advise the petitioners of its final decision in writing, and publish its conclusion as a notice in the Federal Register. If appropriate, SBA will amend paragraph (b)(1) of this section to include a new group.

Sharia law in Somali Occupied Minnesota

Always so quick so accomodate anyone except Whites.....

WHITE MEN SHUT THE "F" UP

HERE IS WHAT WALL STREET  PROTESTERS THINK ABOUT WHITE PEOPLE.

BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT... ONLY WHITE PEOPLE ARE "RACISTS"

TAXED FOR BEING WHITE IN SOUTH AFRICA

 

A Tax on White Privilege

Another quite astonishing story to come out of South Africa and the ANC, is a tax on the privilege of being white.

Yes that is right you read that correctly, taxing people on the basis of their ethnicity.
Can you imagine the screams of racism from the left if here in Britain we imposed a tax on other ethnic minority groups.
Desmond Tutu, the retired (Anglican) Archbishop of Cape Town. The Most Rev. Tutu has proposed a new income-redistribution plan that could solve all South Africa’s financial problems: a tax on white people.

Tutu stated “said the damage apartheid caused was impossible to escape” he then went onto say “You all benefited from apartheid.”

What Tutu is forgetting to mention is that since the end of apartheid it is estimated that up too 600,000 Afrikaners are now living in destitute squatter camps where they are denied government benefits, government food-aid and medical care -  and by law, are also denied access the job market, through affirmative action and black empowerment.
Whilst these estimated 600,000 Afrikaners are living in squatter camps many of them are being forced to be demolished in and around Pretoria, the latest being Elsie Brits (30). She lives on the property of the house of her mother in law in Claremont Pretoria. Elsie is the mother of four beautiful children: Anthony (9), Ockert(7), Adriaan (4) and three month old baby Elmarie.
Magda Stroebel, one lone Boer woman who tries to rescue these destitute Afrikaners from the streets of Pretoria and house them in her Angel at Work charity-centre at her own Daspoort smallholding, is caring for 5,000 destitute Afrikaners – 2,000 are children. She is working under a state of siege: facing a campaign of heavy harassment from the ANC-run city council – which is trying to obtain a court order forcing Mrs Stroebel to remove her wendy-house structures, Magda has continually been back and forth to court as the ANC intensifies its effort to destroy these wendy house structures and make another 5000 Afrikaners destitute on the streets of Pretoria.
With Afrikaner fast approaching genocide stage 6, and Tutu calling for a tax being placed on the white people of South Africa, what a wonderful place the Rainbow Nation has become.